Meeting Overview

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE

SOARD  OF REVIEW  – MEETING  OF DECEMBER   4, 2014

 

 

Mfitv.t·BERS  PRESENT:  Jill Fieldstein,   Chairperson;  James  Dodqe,’ Andrew

}’.\nd:rews,  Paul Papay,  Brian Terry,  Blythe  Yost and  Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg

Mfi;M8ERS  ABSENT:    None

ALSO  PRESENT:  Richard  Pakola,  Deputy Town Attorney;  Ann Marie Ambrose, Stenographer   and Cheryl Coopersmith,   Chief Clerk

 

Jill Fieldsteln,   Chairperson,  called the meeting  to order at 7:30 p.rn,

Ms Fietdstein  read the agenda.   Hearings  as listed on this meeting’s  agenda

~htch  are made a part of.these  minutes  were  held as noted below.

 

 

 

Cam-inez Sign  Plan

Review o-f Sign Plan

74.10/1/70;   CO zoning  district

 

Approved

as Presented

ACABOR #14-44

 

Deans Subdivisi0n  –  Lot #1

Review of Structure/Site   Plans

7j7.0.7/1/26.1;     R-15 zoning  district

 

Approved  Subject to Conditions

ACABOR  #14-45

 

Deans. Subdivision  –  Lot #2

Revrew of Structure/Site   Plans

717.07/1/26.2;    R-15 zoning  district

I

Deans SuJ;)divisioA   –  Lot #3

Review  of Structure/Site   Plans

717.07/1/26.3;   R-15 zoning district

 

Approved  Subject to Conditions

 

 

 

Approved  Subject to Condltlons

ACABOR #14-4<9

 

 

 

 

ACABOR #14-47

 

:

Deans Subdivision   –  Lot #4

Review of Structure/Site   Plans

77.07/1126.4;    IR-15 zoning  district

1

i

 

Approved  Subject to Conditions

ACABOR #14-48

 

 

Other  Business:  The Board  reviewed  and approved  the addition  of windows

and a changed  roof line to Quinn Sparkill  Plans,  A CAB OR #11-22,  July 21,  io11. The. Board held that while the proposed changes were minimal  to the structure, they  improved  the overall  appearance  of the structure  and added  value to the

community.

I

 

A motion was made to adjourn  the meeting  by Paul Papay  and seconded  by James  Dodge and aqreed  by alt in attendance.  The  Decisions   on the above hearings,  which  Decisions   are made  by the Board  before the conclusion  of the meeting,  are mailed to the applicant.   The verbatim  minutes  are not transertbed, but are available.    As there was no further  business  before the Board,   the meetiflg was adjourned  at 9:00 p.m.   The  next ACABOR  Meeting  is  scheduled

 

for January  8,  2015.                        cJwu,··

• Dated: December 4, 2014

 

~I’,,

f·.

CLJr>~.  \~

 

 

 

W’~pproved plans  at the December 4, 2014  ACABOR Meeting included the foll.o:rving:

Plans  prepared by George Hodosh Associates, dated July 23, 2014,  last revisron  date of October 20,

2014:

Cover Sheet

A 1:   Foundation Plan

P\2.:  First Floor Plan

 

A3: Second  Floor Plan

A4: Mezzanine  Storage Plan

• -·- ‘ —      .

– -~   ‘· –  .-   ··-  ..

 

A5: First Elevation A6:  Right Elevation A7: Rear Elevation AS: Left Elevation A9: Section A-A

E1:  First Floor  Electrical  Plan

E2: Second Floor Electrical  Plan

P1:  Plumbing   Riser  Diagram

GN:  General  Notes

I

301.:BO S’J.1131~  N’Jl\ll

6.tt. u ldH    S .      330 fBl

.                        .,      -··

 

ACABOR   #14-44:  Caminez  Sign  Plan:  Approved  as Presented

 

 

Town  of Orangetown    -Architecture    and  Community    Appearance    Board  of

Review  Decision

December   4, 2014

Page  1of2

 

TO:

 

FROM:

Danielle Hanken,   27 North Middletown Road, Nanuet, New York,

10954

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Caminez Sign Plan: The application  of Danielle  Hanken,

Signarama,   applicant,  for Isaac  Ulster  Heights Properties, owner, for review of a

Sign Plan at a site to be known as “Caminez Sign Plan”, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is located  at 60 Dutch Hlll Road, Orangeburg,  Town of Orangetown,  Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 74.10,   Block 1,    Lot 70 in the CO zoninq district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting held Thursday, December 4, 2014, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

Danielle Hanken and George Hanken appeared  and testified for the applicant. The Board received the following items:

 

1. Photographs of proposed signage superimposed on the building,  prepared by

Sign-A-Rama dated June 27,  2014.

 

2014. B. Material Sheet,  signed  by Danielle Hanken,   dated October 27, 2014. C. A copy of the Building Permit Referral, dated August 6,  201 FINDINGS OF FACT:
2015. The Board found that the applicant appeared in front of the Town of

Orangetown Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) on December 3, 2014 and was granted the needed zoning variances.  As a condition of the

variances, the ZBA required that the colors of the sign be reversed; white background/ orange  letters.

 

2. The Board found that the sign would be placed on the second level of the Prel Plaza Building  since the applicant’s  office is on  the second level  of the structure.

 

3. The Board found that the applicant  proposed one sign,  the sign  plan presented to the Board appeared as originally  proposed and must be revised  in accordance with the ZBA requirement that the sign  have a white background/ orange  letters:

 

1. a. Sign oh front of building  will be a 30″ x 19=80″  .063 Aluminum  UL rated light  box with 5″ return A 3/16th,,  thick 30″ x180″ piece  of acrylic sheeted over with White high performance translucent  vinyl. The acrylic will be slid into the new light box and lit from behind with fluorescent tubing.

 

The hearing was then opened to the Public.   There being no one to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing  portion of the meeting  was closed.

 

 

 

 

 

~ –                          .

301.:f:!O ~~1:!310 NM,Dl OS u tJti   8    33ll 11111 f.U\013~N~HO   .:!O  Nl\01

 

ACABOR  #14-44:  Caminez   Sign  Plan:  Approved    as Presented

 

Town  of Orangetown	-Architecture	and  Community	Appearance    Board  of
Review  Decision December   4, 2014 Page 2of2

 

 

DECISION:    In  view of the foregoing  and the testimony  before the Board,   the application   was APPROVED   AS  PRESENTED  (REVERSE  COLORS  AS REQUIRED  BY ZBA  #14-87).

 

The foregoing   resolution  was  presented  and moved  by Jill Fieldstein  and seconded   by James  Dodge  and  carried  as follows;   Jill Fieldstein,    aye;

James  Dodge,  aye; Blythe  Yost,  aye; Andrew  Andrews,  aye,  Brian Terry, aye,

Paul Papay,   aye and  Deborah  Stuhlweissenburg,     aye.

 

The Clerk to the Board  is hereby  authorized,   directed  and empowered  to sign this DECISION and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

 

 

~ac

Dated: December 4, 2014                fl A (}  r.  (}   ~~~~ Cheryl Coopersmith                          ~                              ·r

Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions

 

 

‘··~

 

‘.301.:f.:JO   SJ!H310  NA\01

esn tm    s   m·lrm

 

 

 

 

~ ‘”‘  ……_,.,       ~           ,-.·~·-···  –~.     ……….      ~ .,.._._ -···  -·–      _, ·~·  ~   ..

 

ACABOR #14-45: Deans Subdivision  –  Lot #1- Approved  Subject to

Conditions

 

 

Town of Orangetown  -Architecture  and Community  Appearance  Board of

Review Decision

December 4, 2014

Page 1of3

 

TO: FROM:

Jay Greenwell, 85 Lafayette Avenue, Suffern, New York 10901

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Deans Subdivision –  Lot #1 Plan: The application of HMK Contracting LLC, owner, for review of a Structure/Site Plans at a site to be known as “Deans  Subdivision Lot #1 Plans”,  in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located on Pine Tree Lane, 250 feet south of the intersection of Kings Highway and Pine Tree Lane, Tappan, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 77.07, Block 2, Lot 26.1 in the R-15 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Thursday,  December 4, 2014, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell, Robert Hoene and Sean Keenan appeared and testified. The Board received the following items:

2014. Plot Plan for Building Permit Lot #1 Deans Subdivision prepared by Jay A. Greenwell, PLS, dated November 7, 2014, last revised November 19, 2014.

 

1. Architectural Plans prepared by Robert Hoene, RA, dated September 25,

2012, revised November 18, 2014:

 

A1 .0: Elevations

 

A2.0: Basement/Foundation Plan &  First Floor Plans

 

A3.0: General Notes, Second Floor Plan

 

2014. Landscape Plan for Lot 1 Deans Subdivision prepared by Ronald Haelen, RLA, dated November 23, 2014.

 

1. Prior Board Decisions: PB #14-09, Final Subdivision Planning Board Decision, dated January 29, 2014 and ZBA #13-69, Approved Lot Width Variances for Lots

#3, #4, Street Frontage Variances for Lot #1 and Total Side Yard Variances for

Lots #1, #2, #3 and #4, dated September 25, 2013.

 

2014. Material Sheet prepared by Sean Keenan, dated November 19, 2014. FINDINGS OF FACT:
2015. The Board found that the Deans Subdivision appeared at the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals for Subdivision Approval. The application had extensive review by the Land Use Boards regarding drainage and the removal of the roadway retaining wall.

 

2. The Board found that all four proposed houses will be constructed at the same time. The designs of the houses were driven by the grade of the land.

 

 

 

 

!~l.::f.:W  SY.hl310  NM.01

 

.         …~                                                     .

OS II &HJ    B      3Emf2

 

Nlt\013VNYMO .:W NIOl

 

 

Page 2of3

 

 

 

 

3. The Board found  that the proposed  house would  have four sides of vinyl siding  in Clay color,  manufactured   by Royal Market Square. Decorative  stonework,  manufactured   by Cultured  Stone,  in Dressed Fieldstone  Chardonnay  will be placed  on the exposed  front foundation. The shutters  will be Black  and the shakes  on the gables  will match the vinyl siding. The  porch will be pressure  treated  wood.

 

4. The Board found that the trim, porch railing, windows  and garage doors  would  be White.   The garage  doors will be in the carriage  style. The  roof  shingles  would  be Weathered  Wood,  manufactured   by Timberline.    Coach  lights will be placed  by the front and rear doorways and in accordance  with Town  Code.

 

5. The Board found  that the left side of the house  had a large expansion of horizontal  siding  and suggested.breaking    up the design with  placing shakes  on the upper gable.

 

6. The Board found that the air conditioning   unit would  be placed  by the right elevation  of the house.

 

7. The Board found that the  house,  landscaping  and site plans must agree,  noting the deck on all of the plans shall be in the same  location (rear left). The  landscaping  plans shall be revised.

 

8. The Board found that the Landscaping   Plan to be acceptable,  however the applicant  has the option  of adding  landscaping  along the northwest corner  of the house foundation.    Since this corner  of the foundation  is visible  along the curve  of the street  line, landscaping  would  soften tile appearance  of the house.

 

9. The Board found  that the proposed  plantings  were acceptable, however  gave the applicant  the option of alternative  plantings.   The Board  suggested  planting  an alternative  flowering  tree to the Purple Flower  Plum since this tree  is short lived and subject  to insect blight.  In addition,  it was suggested  that  Ink Berry shrubs  be planted  over Hicks

Yews.

 

The hearing  was then opened  to the Public. Public  Comment:

Matthew  Guiliano,  283  Kings  Highway,  Tappan;  raised concerns  regarding the shape of lot #1 and access to Kings  Highway.

 

Mary Danner,  39 Pine Tree  Lane, Tappan;  questioned  the Board regarding which  trees were to remain  on the site.

 

Mary Leggett,  14 Pine Tree  Lane, Tappan;  expressed  concerns  regarding the condition  of the property  and access to Kings  Highway for lot #1 .

 

There  being  no one else to be heard from the public, the  Public Hearing portion  of the meeting  was  closed.           _   .—                         -.–      .,,

 

 

 

3m3.:l0S~B31~Rh\(U

 

..                      –

00 IIW    B    311  Lm2

 

ACABOR  #14-45:  Deans  Subdivision  –  lot   #1-Approved   Subject to

Conditions

 

Town  of Orangetown	-Architecture	and  Community  Appearance	Board  of
Review   Decision
December   4, 2014 Page 3of3

 

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application  was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

 

1. The proposed house shall have four sides of vinyl siding in Clay color, manufactured by Roya! Market Square. Decorative stonework, manufactured by Cultured Stone, in Dressed Fieldstone Chardonnay will be placed on the exposed front foundation. The shutters will be Black and

the shakes on the gables will match the vinyl siding. The porch will be pressure treated wood.

 

2. The house trim, porch railing, windows and garage doors will be White.

The garage doors will be in the carriage style. The roof shingles will be Weathered Wood, manufactured by Timberline.   Coach lights will be placed by the front and rear doorways and in accordance with Town Code.

 

3. The air conditioning unit would be placed by the right elevation of the house.

 

4. The house, landscaping and site plans must agree, noting the deck to be in the same location on all of the plans (rear left). The landscaping plans shall be revised.

 

5. The applicant has the option of adding landscaping along the northwest corner of the house foundation. Since this corner of the foundation is visible along the curve of the street line, landscaping would soften the appearance of the house.

 

6. The applicant has the option of alternative site plantings. The Board suggested planting an alternative flowering tree to the Purple Flower Plum since this tree is short lived and subject to insect blight. In addition, it was suggested that Ink Berry shrubs be planted over Hicks Yews.

 

7. The applicant has the option of adding shakes to the upper gables of the left elevation of the house to break up the large expansion of horizontal siding. If this option is elected, revised elevations shall be submitted.

 

8. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construction.

 

9. No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved site plan.

 

10. If applicable, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Section

21-25 of the Town of Orangetown Shade Tree Ordinance.

 

The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by James Dodge and seconded by Jill Fieldstein and carried as follows; Jill Fieldstein, aye; James Dodge, aye; Blythe Yost, aye; Andrew Andrews, aye, Paul Papay, aye, Brian Terry, aye and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye.

 

 

Page 1of3

 

TO: FROM:

Jay Greenwell,  85 Lafayette  Avenue,  Suffern,  New York  10901

Architecture   and Community  Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                 Deans Subdivision  –  Lot #2 Plan: The application  of HMK Contracting  LLC, owner, for review  of a Structure/Site   Plans at a site to be known  as “Deans   Subdivision   Lot #2 Plans”,   in accordance  with Article  16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York  and Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.   The site is located  on Pine Tree  Lane, 350 feet south  of the intersection  of Kings  Highway and  Pine Tree  Lane, Tappan,  Town  of Orangetown,  Rockland  County,  New York, and as shown  on the Orangetown

Tax Map as Section  77.07,  Block 2, Lot 26.2 in the R-15 zoning  district.

 

 

Heard by the Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review  of the Town of Orangetown  at a meeting  held Thursday,    December   4, 2014, at which time the Board made the following  determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,  Robert  Hoene  and Sean  Keenan  appeared  and testified. The  Board received  the following  items:

2014. Plot Plan for Building Permit Lot #2 Deans Subdivision   prepared  by Jay A Greenwell,  PLS, dated  November  7, 2014,  last revised  November  19, 2014.

 

1. Architectural Plans prepared  by Robert  Hoene,  RA, dated September  25,

2012,  revised  November  18, 2014: A1 .0: Elevations

A2.0:  Basement/Foundation    Plan &  First Floor Plans

 

A3.0: General Notes, Second Floor Plan

 

2014. Landscape Plan for Lot 2 Deans Subdivision prepared by Ronald Haelen, RLA, dated November 23, 2014.

 

1. Prior Board Decisions: PB #14-09, Final Subdivision Planning Board Decision, dated January 29, 2014 and ZBA #13-69, Approved Lot Width Variances for Lots

#3, #4, Street Frontage Variances for Lot #1 and Total Side Yard Variances for

Lots #1., #2, #3 and #4, dated September 25, 2013.

 

2014. Material Sheet prepared by Sean Keenan, dated November 19, 2014. FINDINGS OF FACT:
2015. The Board found that the Deans Subdivision appeared at the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals for Subdivision Approval. The application had extensive review by the Land Use Boards regarding drainage and the removal of the roadway retaining wall.

 

2. The Board found that all four proposed houses will be constructed at the same time. The designs of the houses were driven by the grade of the land,

 

3. The Board found that proposed house would have four sides of vinyl

siding in Pear! with Country Beige ~{)h9~e-~_1}IJ.?D.l:!f9-9t~I~9 by Royal Market Square. Decorative stonework, m~nufactured by Cultured Stone, in Buck County Stone (grey/brown tone) will be placed on the exposed front foundation.                                           30ld.:f O S)HB10 NfAE>i

 

8S II W  g    3″l.1J 1im2

 

KA\Ol3SNvtJO  .:IO  NA\Ql

 

ACABOR  #14-46:  Deans  Subdivision  –  Lot #2· Approved   Subject   to

Conditions

 

Town  of Orangetown	-Architecture	and  Community	Appearance	Board  of
Review  Decision
December   4, 2014 Page 2 of 3

 

 

4. The Board found that the house trim, porch  railing, windows  and garage doors will be White.   The garage  doors will  be in the carriage  style.  The roof shingles  will be Weathered   Wood,  manufactured   by Timberline   and the shutters  will be Burgundy.     Coach  lights wiH  be placed  by the front and rear doorways  and in accordance  with Town  Code.

 

5. The Board found  that the left  side of house  had a large expansion  of horizontal    siding   and suggested  breaking  up the design  with placing shakes on the upper gable.

 

6. The Board  found  that the air conditioning  unit would  be placed  by the right elevation    of the house.

 

7. The Board found  that the house,   landscaping    and site plans   must agree, noting  the patio on all  of the plans   shall be in the same  location   (rear left). The landscaping    plans shall   be revised.

 

8. 8. The Board found   that the  Landscaping   Plan was acceptable,  however gave the  applicant  the  option  of alternative  plantings.    The  Board

suggested  planting    an alternative   flowering  tree to the Purple Flower  Plum since this tree is short lived  and subject  to insect  blight.  In addition,   it was suggested  that  Ink Berry shrubs  be planted  over Hicks Yews.

‘

The hearing was then opened to the Public.

 

Public Comment:

 

Matthew Guiliano,  283 Kings Highway, Tappan;   raised concerns regarding the shape of lot #1  and access to Kings Highway.

 

Mary Danner, 39 Pine Tree Lane,  Tappan;  questioned the Board regarding which trees were to remain on the site.

 

Mary Leggett,  14  Pine Tree Lane, Tappan;  expressed concerns regarding the condition of the property and access to Kings Highway for lot #1.

 

There being no one else to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing portion  of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:   In view of the foregoing  and the testimony before the Board, the application  was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITlONS:

 

1. 1. The proposed house will have four sides  of vinyl siding in Pearl with Country Beige  Shakes,  manufactured by Royal  Market Square. Decorative stonework, manufactured by Cultured  Stone, in Buck County Stone (grey/brown tone)  will be placed  on the exposed front foundatio

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘·“‘t”‘!'”‘       ~   •.  ,,.,       ,_.   •••–··.~·        ,  … ,   ,…..,. ..,_,     .~,––   ..   -······    r··-r.-··’“      •••

….

 

:iOl.:!.:10  S)HB1G NMOl

es rt:11m  s  ~11fiml

 

NM013 ~NV}JO   .:!O NJiOl

 

 

Page 3of3

 

 

 

2. The house trim, porch railing, windows and garage doors will be White.

The garage doors will be in the carriage style. The roof shingles will be Weathered Wood, manufactured by Timberline and the shutters will be Burgundy. Coach lights will be placed by the front and rear doorways and in accordance with Town Code.

 

 

3. The air conditioning unit would be placed by the right elevation of the house. ·

 

 

4. The house, landscaping and site plans must agree, noting the patio on all of the plans shall be in the same location (rear left). The landscaping plans shall be revised.

 

 

5. The applicant has the option of adding shakes to the upper gable of the left elevation of the house to break up the large expansion of horizontal siding. If this option is elected, revised elevations shall be submitted.

 

6. The Landscaping Plan was acceptable, however gave the applicant the option of alternative plantings. The Board suggested planting an alternative flowering tree to the Purple Flower Plum since this tree is short lived and subject to insect blight. In addition, it was suggested that Ink Berry shrubs be planted over Hicks Yews.

 

 

7. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construction.

 

 

8. No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved site plan.

 

9. If applicable, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Section

21-25 of the Town of Orangetown Shade Tree Ordinance.

 

The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Jill Fieldstein and seconded by Paul Papay and carried as follows; Jill Fieldstein, aye;

James Dodge, aye; Blythe Yost, aye; Andrew Andrews, aye, Brian Terry, aye and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this DIECISION and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and

the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

r

Dated.·:  December   4, 2014          ~                      {i,6pt\~

Cheryl Coopersmith                                                    L

Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions            .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3~U.::JO S)H!310 RMOl GSilW  8 330Lm ND\0.I.]SNVHO  30 NliOl

 

ACABOR  #14-47:  Deans  Subdivision  –  lot   #3-Approved   Subject to

~n~tio~                                                                                             ‘

 

 

Town  of Orangetown  -Architecture    and  Community  Appearance    Board  of

Review  Decision

December   4, 2014

Page  1of3

 

TO: FROM:

Jay Greenwell,  85 Lafayette  Avenue,  Suffern,  New York  10901

Architecture  and Community  Appearance   Board of Review

 

 

RE:                 Deans Subdivision  –  Lot #3 Plan: The application  of HMK Contracting   LLC, owner,  for review of a Structure/Site   Plans at a site to be known as “Deans Subdivision lot  #3 Plans”,  in accordance  with Article  16 of the Town  Law of the State of New York  and Chapter  2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.    The site is located  on Pine Tree  Lane, 450 feet south  of the intersection  of Kings Highway  and Pine Tree  Lane, Tappan,  Town  of Orangetown,   Rockland  County,  New York, and as shown  on the Orangetown

Tax Map as Section  77.07,  Block 2, Lot 26.3  in the R-15 zoning  district.

 

 

Heard by the Architecture   and Community  Appearance   Board of Review  of the Town  of Orangetown  at a meeting  held Thursday,  December 4, 2014, at which time the Board  made the following  determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,  Robert  Hoene and Sean Keenan  appeared  and testified. The Board  received the following  items:

1. Plot Plan for Building Permit Lot #3 Deans  Subdivision  prepared  by Jay A

Greenwell,  PLS, dated  November  7, 2014,  last revised  November  19, 2014.

 

1. Architectural Plans prepared  by Robert  Hoene,  RA, dated  March  5, 2013, revised  November  18, 2014:

 

A1 .0: Elevations

 

A2.0:  Basement/Foundation    Plan & First Floor Plans

 

A3.0:  General  Notes, Second  Floor Plan

 

2014. Landscape Plan for Lot 3 Deans Subdivision   prepared  by Ronald  Haelen, RLA, dated  November  25, 2014.

 

1. Prior Board Decisions: PB #14-09, Final Subdivision   Planning  Board  Decision, dated January  29, 2014  and ZBA #13-69,  Approved  Lot Width  Variances  for Lots

#3, #4, Street  Frontage  Variances  for Lot #1 and Total  Side Yard Variances  for

Lots #1, #2, #3 and #4, dated  September  25, 2013.

 

2014. Material Sheet prepared  by Sean  Keenan,  dated  November  19, 2014. FINDINGS  OF FACT:
2015. The Board found that the Deans  Subdivision  appeared  at the Planning Board and Zoning  Board of Appeals  for Subdivision  Approval.  The application  had extensive  review  by the Land Use Boards  regarding drainage  and the removal  of the roadway  retaining wall.

 

2. The Board found that all four  proposed  houses  will be constructed  at the same time.   The designs  of the houses  were driven  by the grade of the land.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3’31.:.L.W S)HJ31~ NA\01 os·u-rm  a    aan mrz U013;J!..JVlH)   ao N~Ol

 

 

 

 

 

3. The Board found that the proposed house would  have four  sides of vinyl siding  in Greystone  color,  manufactured   by Royal Market Square. Decorative  stonework,  manufactured   by Eldorado,  in Lime Stone (brown tone) will be placed  on the exposed  front foundation.

 

4. The Board found that the house trim, porch  rallinq, windows, and garage doors will be White.   The garage doors will be in the carriage  style. The roof shingles  will be Pewter Grey,  manufactured   by Timberline  and the shutters  will be Dark Blue.    Coach  lights will be placed  by the front  and rear doorways  and  in accordance  with Town  Code.

 

5. The Board found that the left side of the house had a large expansion  of horizontal  siding  and suggested  breaking  up the desi.gn with  placing shakes  on the upper gable.

 

6. The Board found that the air conditioning   unit would  be placed  by the right elevation  of the house.

 

7. The Board found that the Landscaping   Plan was acceptable,   however gave the applicant  the option  of alternative  plantings.   The  Board

suggested  planting  an alternative  flowering  tree to the  Purple  Flower Plum since this tree is short lived and subject  to insect  blight. In addition,  it was suggested  that  Ink Berry shrubs  be planted  over Hicks Yews.

I

The hearing was then opened  to the Public. Public  Comment:

Matthew  Guiliano,  283 Kings Highway,  Tappan;  raised concerns  regarding

the shape of lot #1 and access to Kings Highway.

 

Mary Danner,  39 Pine Tree  Lane, Tappan;  questioned  the Board regarding which  trees were to remain on the site.

 

Mary Leggett,  14 Pine Tree  Lane, Tappan;  expressed  concerns  regarding  the condition  of the property  and access to Kings  Highway for lot #1.

 

There  being  no one else to be heard from the public, the  Public Hearing portion of the meeting  was  closed.

 

 

 

DECISION:  In view  of the foregoing  and  the  testimony  before  the  Board, the  application  was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE  FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

 

1. The proposed  house will have four  sides of vinyl siding in Greystone  color, manufactured   by Royal Market Square.  Decorative  stonework,

manufactured   by Eldorado,  in Lime Stone style will be placed  on the

exposed  front foundation.

 

 

 

 

~ …       –     –·-~.–•.            -.-· .. ~·     •,     r           •  •

 

 

 

3~1~.:10  S)lH310 HM.01

 

DS~!..W· i   a11··LrBZ

 

NM013!)N~b!O  JO N.M.OJ..

 

ACABOR #14-47: Deans Subdivision  –  Lot #3- Approved  Subject to

Conditions

 

 

Town of Orangetown  – Architecture   and Community  Appearance  Board of

Review Decision

December 4, 2014

Page  3of3

 

 

 

 

2. The house trim, porch railing, windows and garage doors will be White.

The garage doors will be in the carriage style. The roof shingles will be

Pewter Grey, manufactured by Timberline and the shutters will be Dark Blue.   Coach lights will be placed by the front and rear doorways and in accordance with Town Code.

 

3. The air conditioning unit would be placed by the right elevation of the house.

 

4. The applicant has the option of adding shakes to the upper gable of the left elevation of the house to break up the large expansion ~f horizontal siding. If this option is elected, revised elevations shall be submitted.

 

5. The Landscaping Plan was acceptable, however gave the applicant the option of alternative plantings. The Board suggested planting an alternative flowering tree to the Purple Flower Plum since this tree is short lived and subject to insect blight. In addition, it was suggested that Ink Berry shrubs be planted over Hicks Yews.

 

6. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construction.

 

7. No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved site plan.

 

8. If applicable, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Section

21-25 of the Town of Orangetown Shade Tree Ordinance.

 

The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Blythe Yost and seconded by Bruce Terry and carried as follows; Jill Fieldstein, aye;

James Dodge, aye; Blythe Yost, aye; Andrew Andrews, aye, Brian Terry, aye,

Paul Papay, aye and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg, aye.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this DECISION and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and

the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review.

 

Dated: December 4, 2014

Cheryl Coopersmith

Chief Clerk Boards and Commissions

 

 

 

–      –          ”ioB.:!0 ~)i1f31$ NMOl

3$13.40 !)JH?no  N1l&1  BS llI w B –  mIll

85′ -~;119     e ·          m  .mz ff,l\01asrP1~ o .:!{)  lil1A01

 

NMDl33NV~O .:10  NAf01

 

 

TO: FROM:

Jay Greenwell, 85 Lafayette Avenue, Suffern, New York 10901

Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review

 

 

RE:               Deans Subdivision –  Lot #4 Plan: The application of HMK Contracting LLC, owner, for review of a Structure/Site Plans at a site to be known as “Deans Subdivision  Lot #4 Plans”, in accordance with Article 16  of the Town Law of the State of New York and Chapter 2 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown.  The site is located on Pine Tree Lane, 500 feet south of the intersection of Kings Highway and Pine Tree Lane, Tappan, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 77,07, Block 2,  Lot 26.5  in the R-15 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Architecture and Community Appearance Board of Review of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held  Thursday, December 4, 2014, at which time the Board made the following determinations:

 

Jay Greenwell,  Robert Hoene and Sean Keenan appeared and testified. The Board received the following items:

2014. Plot Plan for Building Permit Lot #4 Deans Subdivision prepared by Jay A. Greenwell,  PLS, dated November 7,  2014.                                        ·

 

1. Architectural Plans prepared by Robert Hoene, RA, dated March 5, 2013, revised November 18, 2014:

 

A1 .0:  Elevations

 

A2.0: Basement/Foundation Plan &  First Floor Plans

 

A3.0:  General  Notes,  Second Floor  Plan

 

2014. Landscape Plan for Lot 3 Deans Subdivision  prepared by Ronald Haelen, RLA, dated November 23,  2014.

 

1. Prior Board Decisions: PB #14-09, Final Subdivision Planning Board Decision, dated January 29,  2014 and ZBA #13-69,  Approved Lot Width Variances for Lots

#3, #4,  Street Frontage Variances for Lot #1  and Total Side Yard Variances for

Lots #1,  #2, #3 and #4, dated September 25, 2013.

 

2014. Material Sheet prepared by Sean Keenan, dated November 19,  2014. FINDINGS OF FACT:
2015. 1. The Board found that the Deans Subdivision  appeared at the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals for Subdivision  Approva  The application had extensive  review by the Land Use Boards regarding drainage and  the removal  of the roadway retaining wall.

 

2. The Board found that all four proposed houses will be constructed at the same time.  The designs  of the houses were driven by the grade of the land.

 

 

 

• ‘•·>:”‘·.

 

ACABOR  #14-48:  Deans  Subdivision  –  Lot  #4- Approved   Subject   to

Conditions

 

Town  of Orangetown Review   Decision	-Architecture	and  Community    Appearance	Board  of
December   4~  2014 Page 2of3

 

 

3. The Board found that the proposed house would have four sides of vinyl siding in Country Beige color, manufactured by Royal Market Square. Shakes will be placed on the front gable to match the siding. The house trim, porch railing, windows and garage doors will be White. The garage doors will be in the carriage style. The roof shingles will be Weathered Wood, manufactured by Timberline and the shutters will be Dark Brown. The deck will be pressure treated wood. Coach lights will be placed by the front and rear doorways and in accordance with Town Code. The

applicant has the option of adding decorative stone work manufactured by

Cultured Stone in a natural tone to be placed under the porch.

 

4. The Board found that the air conditioning unit would be placed by the right elevation of the house.

 

5. The Board found that the left side of the house had a large expansion of horizontal siding and suggested breaking up the design with placing shakes on the upper gable.

I

6. The Board found that the Landscaping Plan was acceptable, however gave the applicant the option of alternative plantings. The Board suggested planting an alternative flowering tree to the Purple Flower Plum since this tree is short lived and subject to insect blight. In addition, it was suggested that Ink Berry shrubs be planted over Hicks Yews.

 

Public  Comment:

 

Matthew Guiliano, 283 Kings Highway, Tappan; raised concerns regarding the shape of lot #1 and access to Kings Highway.

 

Mary Danner, 39 Pine Tree Lane, Tappan; questioned the Board regarding which trees were to remain on the site.

 

Mary Leggett, 14 Pine Tree Lane, Tappan; expressed concerns regarding the concern regarding the condition of the property and access to Kings Highway for lot #1.

 

There being no one else to be heard from the public, the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was closed.

 

DECISION:  In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application was APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

 

1. The proposed house will have four sides of vinyl siding in Country Beige color, manufactured by Royal Market Square. Shakes will be placed on the front gable to match the siding. The house trim, porch railing, windows and garage doors will be White. The garage doors will be in the carriage style. The roof shingles will be Weathered Wood, manufactured by Timberline and the shutters will be Dark Brown. The deck will be pressure treated wood. Coach lights will be placed by the front and rear doorways and in accordance with Town.Cod~. The applicant has the

option of adding decorative stone work manufacturedby  CulturedStone  in a natural tone to be placed under the porch.

~~tldO S)lH31’~ Nlfff!

48:~-•    a  •:mm

 

~nf0136N’t~.W.::W  NM01

 

 

 

2. The air conditioning unit would be placed by the right elevation of the house.

 

3. The applicant has the option of adding shakes to the upper gable of the left elevation of the house to break up the large expansion of horizontal siding. If this option is elected,  revised elevations shall be submitted.

 

4. The landscaping  plan was acceptable,  however gave the applicant the option of alternative plantings.  The Board suggested planting an alternative flowering tree to the Purple Flower Plum since this tree is short lived and subject to insect blight. In addition,  it was suggested that Ink Berry shrubs be planted over Hicks Yews.

 

5. 5. Trees to be saved shall be protected with snow fencing to the drip line during construct

 

6. No grading is to take place within five feet of any property line, except as specified on the approved site plan.

 

7. 7. If applicable,  the applicant shall  comply with the requirements of Section

21-25 of the Town of Orangetown Shade Tree Ordinance.

 

The foregoing resolution was presented and moved by Paul Papay and seconded by Andrew Andrews and carried as follows; Jill Fieldstein,  aye; James Dodge, aye;  Blythe Yost,  aye; Andrew Andrews,  aye, Brian Terry, aye; Paul  Papay,   aye and Deborah Stuhlweissenburg,  aye.

 

The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this DECISION and file  a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and

the Office of the Architecture and Community Appearance Boar ·     o1f Review.

 

 

cj

Dated: December 4, 2014

Cheryl  Coopersmith

Chief Clerk: Boards and Commissions

 

 

 

,,-,

• ~$••Si.DTI,….,._•

1Ati1-ll3NVH@  ;i_@. Qt.l