Town of Orangetown

Official Town of Orangetown Municipal Website

  • Departments
    • Assessor
    • Building, Zoning, Planning, Administration and Enforcement
      • Architecture & Community Appearance Board of Review
      • Historical Areas Board of Review (HABR)
      • Planning Board
      • Zoning Board of Appeals
    • Environmental Management and Engineering
    • Finance
    • Fire Prevention Bureau
    • Highway Department
    • Information Technology
    • Justice Court
    • Personnel Department
    • Parks and Recreation Department
      • Blue Hill Golf Course
      • Broadacres Golf Course
    • Orangetown Historical Museum & Archives
    • Orangetown Police Department
    • Collector of Taxes
    • Supervisor’s Office
    • Town Attorney
    • Town Clerk
  • Community
    • Arts, Music and Theaters
    • Camp Shanks Museum
    • Colleges and Universities
    • Community Organizations
    • Elected Officials
    • Emergency Services
    • Farmer’s Market
    • Local Support Organizations
    • Food Pantries
    • Orangetown at a Glance
      • Historic Sites
      • Hotels and Lodging
      • Parks and Open Spaces
    • Orangetown Fire Departments
    • Orangetown Historical Museum and Archives
    • Public Libraries
    • Public Schools
    • Utilities
    • Regional Links
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Walkway of Heroes
    • Sports
    • Senior Citizen Information
  • Boards/Committees
    • Boards
      • Town Board
      • Architecture & Community Appearance Board of Review
      • Historical Areas Board of Review (HABR)
      • Planning Board
      • Zoning Board of Appeals
      • Orangetown Housing Authority Board
      • Board of Assessment Review
      • Board of Ethics
      • Sanitation Commission
    • Committees
      • Blue Hill Golf Committee
      • Bureau of Fire Prevention Committee
      • Community Development Block (CDBG) Committee
      • Industrial Use Committee
      • Office of Emergency Management Committee
      • Orangetown Air Quality Review Committee
      • Orangetown Comprehensive Plan Committee
      • Orangetown Environmental Committee
      • Orangetown Parks Development Advisory Committee
      • Project Review Committee
      • Police Reform Committee
      • TV Advisory Committee
      • Shade Tree Commission
      • Volunteer Health Advisory Committee
      • Senior Citizen Advisory Committee
      • Youth Recreation Assessment Advisory Committee
      • Substance Abuse Committee
      • Traffic Advisory Board
  • Agenda/Minutes
    • Town Board
    • Calendar
    • Planning Board
    • Zoning Board of Appeals
    • Architecture & Community Appearance Board
    • Police Reform Committee
    • Historic Areas Board
    • Comprehensive Plan Committee
  • How Do I?
    • View or Pay Property/School Taxes Online
    • Report a Pothole
    • Pay a Ticket
    • Renew My Highway Drop Off Center Permit
    • Order a Municipal Search for a 1 or 2 Family Dwelling Only
    • Request a Streetlight Repair?
    • File an Odor Complaint
    • Report a Potential Code Violation
    • Submit a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) Request
    • Get a Building Permit
    • Sign up for the Do Not Knock Registry
    • Garbage and Recycling Pickup
    • Dispose of Expired and Unused Medications
    • Find Information Regarding Job Openings in the Town of Orangetown
    • Request a New Streetlight?
  • Newsletter Signup

Zoning Board of Appeals October 18, 2017

Related Meetings: Zoning Board October 18, 2017

ZBA-Minutes-October-18-2017.pdf

MINUTES

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

October 18,  2017

 

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:         DAN SULLIVAN

JOAN SALOMON

MICHAEL BOSCO

JOAN SALOMON

THOMAS QUINN

 

ABSENT:                               PATRICIA CASTELLI

LEONARD FEROLDI, ALTERNATE

 

 

ALSO PRESENT:                  Dennis Michaels, Esq.            Deputy Town Attorney

Ann Marie Ambrose,              Official Stenographer

Christian Catania,                   Senior Clerk Typist

 

 

This meeting was called to order at 7: 00 P.M. by Mr. Sullivan, Chairman.

Hearings on this meeting’s agenda, which are made a part of this meeting, were held as noted below:

 

PUBLISHED ITEMS

 

APPLICANTS                                   DECISIONS

 

NEW ITEMS:

O’HARA                                            SIDE YARD AND                ZBA#17-78

77 Lark Street                                     BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCES

Pearl River, NY                                  APPROVED

69.14 / 2 / 27; R-15 zone

 

 

ASKENAS CHIROPRACTIC          SIGN SIZE VARIANCE                              ZBA#17-79

67 South Main Street                          APPROVED

Pearl River, NY

68.20 / 1 / 48; CO zone

 

SKAE TRAINING                            §8.15 F-4 VARIANCE                      ZBA#17-80

CENTER ANTENNA                        APPROVED

337-330 Blaisdell Road

Orangeburg, NY

76.08 / 1 / 3 & 4; LIO zone

 

DEFIANT BREWERY                      PARKING VARIANCE                               ZBA#17-81

6 East Dexter Plaza                             APPROVED

Pearl River, NY

68.20 / 1 / 1; LI zone

 

DURSO                                              FLOOR AREA RATIO AND                                   ZBA#17-82

132 Lester Drive                                 REAR YARD VARIANCES

Tappan, NY                                        APPROVED

74.18 / 1 / 14; R-15 zone

 

DEFERRED DECISION:

 

U.S. INFORMATION SYSTEMS                DEFERRED                           ZBA#17-65

25 Ramland Road

Orangeburg, NY

73.20 / 1 / 26; LIO zone

Page 2 Minutes

 

 

 

 

THE DECISIONS RELATED TO THE ABOVE HEARINGS are inserted herein and made part of these minutes.

 

The verbatim minutes, as recorded by the Board’s official stenographer for the above hearings, are not transcribed.

 

There being no further business to come before the Board, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30  P.M.

 

Dated: October 18, 2017

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

By____________________________

 

Deborah Arbolino, Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

APPLICANT

TOWN ATTORNEY

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS

BUILDING INSPECTOR (Individual Decisions)

Rockland County Planning

 

 

 

 

DECISION

 

  SIDE YARD AND BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCES APPROVED

 

To:  Noreen O’Hara                                                   ZBA #17-78

77 Lark Street                                                      Date: October 18, 2017

Pearl River, New York 10965                             Permit # 46703

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA#17-78: Application of  Noreen O’Hara for variances from  Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, Chapter 43, R-15 District, Section 3.12, Columns 9 (Side Yard: 20’ required, 10.78’ proposed) and 12 (Building Height: 10.78’ permitted, 15.67’ proposed) for an addition to an existing single-family residence.  The Premises are located at 77 Lark Street, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.14, Block 2, Lot 27 in the R-15 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, October  18, 2017 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

Ed and Noreen O’Hara appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

 

  1. Architectural plans dated March 5, 2013 by Robert Hoene, Registered Architect ( 4 pages).
  2. A letter in support of the application singed by eight neighbors.
  3. A letter dated October 11, 2017 from the Rockland County Department of Planning signed by Douglas J. Schuetz, Acting Commissioner of Planning.
  4. A letter dated October 6, 2017 from the Rockland County Highway Department singed by Joseph Arena, Senior Engineering Technician.
  5. A letter dated September 22, 2017 from the Rockland County Drainage Agency signed by Vincent Altieri, Executive Director.
  6. A letter dated October 6, 2017 from the Rockland County Sewer District #1 signed by Joseph LaFiandra, Engineer II.
  7. A letter dated September 21, 2017 from the Rockland County Health Department signed by Scott Mckane, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon  and carried unanimously.

 

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bosco and carried as follows:  Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; and Mr. Quinn, aye. Mr. Feroldi and Ms. Castelli  were absent.

 

 

Noreen O’Hara testified that they are proposing to expand the kitchen; that there is no pool in the rear yard; that they would have to reconfigure the house to move the kitchen; and that she spoke to her closest neighbor, Kathleen Richards and she has no problem with the proposed addition.

 

Ed O’Hara testified that that the existing kitchen is 8’ x 10’; that the property is shaped like a V and they would need a variance anywhere they bumped out into the rear because of the shape of the property.

 

O’Hara                                                                                    Permit#46703

ZBA#17-78

Page 2 of  4

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment.

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan  made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested side yard and building height variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The property is oddly shaped, and a variance would be required anywhere that an addition would be proposed.

 

 

  1. The requested side yard and building height variances  will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The property is oddly shaped, and a variance would be required anywhere that an addition would be proposed.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances. The property is oddly shaped, and a variance would be required anywhere that an addition would be proposed.

 

 

  1. The requested side yard and building height variances, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

O’Hara                                                                        Permit #46703

ZBA#17-78

Page  3  of  4

 

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested side yard and building height variances are APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

 

O’Hara                                                                        Permit# 46703

ZBA#17-78

Page  4 of  4

 

 

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested side yard and building height  variances  was presented and moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Ms. Salomon  and carried as follows: Mr. Bosco, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli  and Mr. Feroldi were absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  October 18, 2017

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-M.M.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECISION

 

   SIGN SIZE VARIANCE APPROVED

 

To: Brian O’Connor (Askenas sign)                           ZBA #17-79

711 Executive Blvd. Suite G                               Date: October 18, 2017

Valley Cottage, New York 10989                       Permit #46708

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA#17-79: Application of  Askenas Chiropractic Gramercy Pain and Rehabilitation  for a variance from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, CO District,  Section 3.11, Column 5 #6 (Sign: 12 sq. ft. permitted, 35 sq. ft. proposed) for a sign at a new business.  The premises are located at 67 South Main Street, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.20, Block 1, Lot 48; in the CO zoning district.

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, October  18, 2017 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

Brain O’Connor, Frohling Signs, appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Site plan.
  2. Sign plans dated October 16, 2017 from Frohling Sign Company.
  3. A letter dated October 6, 2017 from the Rockland County Highway Department signed by Joseph Arena, Senior Engineering Technician.
  4. A letter dated October 13, 2017 from the Rockland County Department of Planning singed by Douglas J. Schuetz, acting Commissioner of Planning.
  5. A letter dated September 22, 2017 from the Rockland County Drainage Agency signed by Vincent Altieri, Executive Director.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Mr. Bosco and carried unanimously.

 

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan  moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application seeks area or bulk variances for construction or expansion of primary, or accessory or appurtenant , non –residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a use variance and consistent with local land use controls; this application is exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (7); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows:  Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; and Mr. Bosco, aye. Mr. Feroldi and Ms. Castelli were absent.

 

 

 

 

Brian O’Connor, Frohling Sign Company, testified that the proposed sign is internally illuminated; that there are two doctors in the building; that the circular logo is for the chiropractic portion of the practice and the lower part of the sign is for the rehabilitation portion of the practice; that the area is almost all commercial; that they are asking for a 35 sq. ft. sign; that down the street is a gym and other tenants, towards Central is Mehl Electric, laundromat and bars; and that no residential properties are in the area.

 

 

Askenas Sign                                                  Permit#46708

ZBA#17-79

Page 2 of  4

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment.

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested sign size variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Other similar signs exist in the area, which is predominately a commercial area.

 

 

  1. The requested sign size variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Other similar signs exist in the area, which is predominately a commercial area.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances.

 

 

  1. The requested sign size variance, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that is not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Askenas Sign                                                  Permit#46708

ZBA#17-79

Page  3  of  4

 

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested sign size variance is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Askenas Sign                                      Permit#46708

ZBA#17-79

Page  4 of  4

 

 

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested sign size variance was presented and moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Ms. Salomon  and carried as follows: Mr. Bosco, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Mr. Feroldi and  Ms. Castelli were absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  October 18, 2017

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-M.M.

 

 

DECISION

 

  • 8.15F-4 COMMUNICATION ANTENNA LOCATION VARIANCE APPROVED

 

To:  Donald Brenner (Skae)                                                   ZBA #17-80

4 Independence Avenue                                     Date: October 18, 2017

Tappan, New York 10983                                   Permit #46014

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA#17-80: Application of Skae Training Center Antenna for variances from Chapter 43 of the Town of Orangetown Code, LIO District, Section 8.15 F-4 (bars new wireless communications facilities from being sited within 500 feet of any existing wireless communication antenna).   The site is located at 337-330 Blaisdell Road, Orangeburg, New York and is identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 76.08, Block 1, Lots 3 & 4; in the LIO zoning district.

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, October  18, 2017 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

Donald Brenner, Attorney, appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Survey dated November 11, 2016 by Sporaco & Youngblood, L.S..
  2. Planning Board Decision #17-09 dated July 26, 2017.
  3. A letter dated October 12, 2017 from the Rockland County Department of Planning singed by Douglas J. Schuetz, Acting Commissioner of Planning.
  4. A letter dated September 15, 2017 from the Rockland County Highway Department signed by Joseph Arena, Senior Engineering Technician.
  5. A memorandum dated September 14, 2017 from Bruce Peters, PE., Engineer III Orangetown.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Mr. Bosco and carried unanimously.

 

 

 

On advice of  Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan  moved for a Board determination that since the Planning Board noticed its intent to declare itself Lead Agency and distributed that notice of intention to all Involved Agencies, including the ZBA who consented or did not object to the Planning Board acting as Lead Agency for this application, pursuant to coordinated review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulation § 617.6 (b)(3); and since the Planning Board conducted a SEQRA reviews and, on July 20, 2017 rendered an  environmental determination of no significant adverse environmental impacts to result from the proposed land use action (i.e. a “Negative Declaration” or “Neg Dec.”), the ZBA is bound by the Planning Board’s Neg Dec and the ZBA cannot require further SEQRA review pursuant to SEQRA Regulation § 617.6 (b)(3). The motion was seconded by Mr. Quinn and carried as follows:  Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; and Mr. Sullivan, aye. Mr. Feroldi and Ms. Castelli were absent.

 

 

 

Donald Brenner, Attorney, testified that for one and a half years the company has been making observations for location of this antenna; that the antenna is not a cell tower but a receiver; that is a private system that gets signals from Europe but does not transmit; that they already received a preliminary approval from the Planning Board and a neg. dec. for Seqra; that this application has nothing to do with the Town Board ordinance on cell towers because it is not a cell tower; that it is like a Hamm radio receiver of financial institution goes into the system on the property; and that it is only 75’ high.

 

 

Skae Antenna                                                  Permit#46014

ZBA#17-80

Page 2 of  4

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment.

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan  made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested8.15 F-4 antenna location variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The location of the 75’ antenna will not have an adverse impact on the area.

 

  1. The Board made a motion to override the first and second sentences only of the County Planning Department’s modification #3 in its 10/12/2017 NYS General Municipal Law (GML) letter, for the reason that these matters are addressed as part of the Planning Board’s review, and the application must return to the Planning Board for Final review. The third sentence was satisfactorily addressed by the applicant: the antenna receives transmissions only, and is not a “cell tower”.

 

 

  1. The requested  8.15 F-4 antenna location variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The location of the 75’ antenna will not have an adverse impact on the area.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining a variance.

 

 

  1. The requested8.15 F-4 antenna location variance, although somewhat substantial, affords benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Skae Antenna                                                              Permit# 46014

ZBA#17-80

Page  3  of  4

 

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested §8.15 F-4 antenna location variance is APPROVED; and to override the first and second sentences only of the County Planning Department’s modification #3 in its 10/12/2017 (GML) letter, for the reason that these matters are addresses as part of the Planning Board’s review, and the application must return to the Planning Board for Final review, and the third sentence was satisfactorily addressed by the applicant: the antenna receives transmissions only, and is not a “cell tower”; and FURTHER RESOLVED that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

Skae Antenna                                                  Permit#46014

ZBA#17-80

Page  4 of  4

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested §8.15 F-4 antenna location variance and to override the first and second sentences only of the County Planning Department’s modification #3 in its 10/12/2017 (GML) letter, for the reason that these matters are addressed as part of the Planning Board’s review, and the application must return to the Planning Board for Final review, and the third sentence was satisfactorily addressed by the applicant: the antenna receives transmissions only, and is not a “cell tower”; was presented and moved by Mr. Quinn, seconded by Mr. Bosco  and carried as follows: Mr. Bosco, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli and Mr. Feroldi were absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  October 18, 2017

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-R.A.O.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECISION

 

  OFF-STREET PARKING VARIANCES APPROVED

 

To:  Donald Brenner (Defiant Brewery)                     ZBA #17-81

4 Independence Avenue                                      Date: October 18, 2017

Tappan, New York 10983                                   Permit # 46527

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA#17-81: Application of  Defiant Brewery for a variance from Zoning Code (Chapter 43)  Section 3.11, refers to CS District, (1 off-street parking space per 1.5 occupants from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.: 162 parking  spaces required: 71 off-street parking spaces exist for Dexter Plaza), for Defiant Brewery Co. to expand their services and operate a cabaret facility. The premises are located at 6 East Dexter Plaza, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.20, Block 1,   Lot 1; LI zoning district.

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, October  18, 2017 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

 

Donald Brenner, Attorney, appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Survey for 4-6 East Dexter Plaza Condominium dated March 16, 2015 with latest revision date of June 23, 2017 signed and sealed by Jay Greenwell, L.S..
  2. Architectural plans dated May 11, 2017 by Lorin J. Sonenshine, Registered Architect.
  3. A letter dated October 13, 2017 from the Rockland County Department of Planning signed by Douglas J. Schuetz, Acting Commissioner of Planning.
  4. A letter dated September 21, 2017 from the Rockland County Department of Health signed by Scott McKane, PE., Senior public health Engineer.
  5. A letter dated October 6, 2017 from the Rockland County Highway Department signed by Joseph Arena, Senior Engineering Technician.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of  Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan  moved for a Board determination that since the Planning Board noticed its intent to declare itself Lead Agency and distributed that notice of intention to all Involved Agencies, including the ZBA who consented or did not object to the Planning Board acting as Lead Agency for this application, pursuant to coordinated review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations § 617.6 (b)(3); and since the Planning Board conducted a SEQRA review and, on July 20, 2017, rendered an environmental determination of no significant adverse environmental impacts to result from the proposed land use action (i.e. a “Negative Declarations” or “Neg Dec.”), the ZBA is bound by the Planning Board’s Neg Dec and the ZBA cannot require further SEQRA review pursuant to SEQRA Regulations § 617.6 (b)(3). The motion was seconded by Mr. Quinn and carried as follows:  Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; and Mr. Sullivan, aye. Mr. Feroldi and Ms. Castelli were absent.

 

 

Donald Brenner testified that the brewery has been in operation for twelve years and is very successful; that in March 2017 they were fined for using additional space that the fire inspector said was not approved; that they originally got the approval under cabaret because that was the only way to permit the  use  in this area; that they have an abundance of parking at night when they are open because the other businesses in the area do not operate the same hours as the brewery; that they would like to expand to have parties and food; that this operation does not

Defiant Brewery                                 Permit#46527

ZBA#17-81

Page 2 of  4

 

hurt anyone; that there is additional parking along East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot during their hours of operation; and that they receive mail at the address that was advertised and they would like an override to the Rockland County Planning letter dated October 13, 2017 number 1 and 2; that they have shown that there is additional parking available to them because of their hours of operation and they do get mail at the published address.

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment.

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan  made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Mr. Bosco and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested off-street parking variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This business operates during hours after the existing businesses in the area are closed, allowing it to use all 151 parking spaces that are allotted for the industrial park. In addition, there is extra parking available on East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot.

 

 

  1. The requested off-street parking variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. This business operates during hours after the existing businesses in the area are closed, allowing it to use all 151 parking spaces that are allotted for the industrial park. In addition, there is extra parking available on East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot.

 

 

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining a variance. This business operates during hours after the existing businesses in the area are closed, allowing it to use all 151 parking spaces that are allotted for the industrial park. In addition, there is extra parking available on East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot.

 

  1. The Board voted to override modifications #1 and #2 of the Rockland County Planning Department’s General Municipal Law (GML) letter dated October 1, 2017 because the applicant does receive mail at the published address, and the business operates during hours after the existing businesses in the area are closed, allowing it to use all 151 parking spaces that are allotted for the industrial park. In addition, there is extra parking available on East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot.

 

 

  1. The requested parking variance, although somewhat substantial, affords benefits to the applicant that is not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.

 

Defiant Brewery                                             Permit#46527

ZBA#17-81

Page  3  of  4

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested off-street parking variance is APPROVED, and the Board voted to override modifications #1 and #2 of the Rockland County Planning Department’s (GML) letter dated October 1, 2017 because the applicant does receive mail at the published address, and the business operates during hours after the existing businesses in the area are closed, allowing it to use all 151 parking spaces that are allotted for the industrial park. In addition, there is extra parking available on East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot ; and FURTHER RESOLVED that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

Defiant Brewery                                 Permit#46527

ZBA#17-81

Page  4 of  4

 

 

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested off-street parking variance to override modifications #1 and #2 of the Rockland County Planning Department’s (GML) letter dated October 1, 2017 because the applicant does receive mail at the published address, and the business operates during hours after the existing businesses in the area are closed, allowing it to use all 151 parking spaces that are allotted for the industrial park. In addition, there is  extra parking available on East Central Avenue and in the MTA lot ;was presented and moved by Mr. Quinn, seconded by Mr. Bosco and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli and Mr. Feroldi were absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  October 18, 2017

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-R.A.O.

 

 

 

 

 

DECISION

 

  FLOOR AREA RATIO AND REAR YARD VARIANCES APPROVED

 

To: John Durso                                                           ZBA #17-82

132 Lester Drive                                      Date: October 18, 2017

Tappan, New York 10983                                   Permit #46125

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA#17-82: Application of John and Erica Durso for variances from Zoning Code (Chapter 43)  of the Town of Orangetown Code, Section 3.12, R-15 District, Group M, Columns 4 (Floor Area Ratio: .20 permitted, .23 existing, .247  proposed) and 11 (Rear Yard: 35’ required, 22.25’ proposed) for an addition to an existing single-family residence. The premises are located at 132 Lester Drive and or 7 Mallory Lane, Tappan,   New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as  Section  74.18,  Block  1,   Lot  14; R-15 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, October  18, 2017 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

John and Erica Durso appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

 

  1. Architectural plans dated March 5, 2013 with the latest revision date of January 7, 2017 by Robert Hoene, Registered Architect.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli  and carried unanimously.

 

 

 

On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows:  Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; and Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Feroldi and Ms. Castelli  were absent.

 

 

John Durso testified that they have owned the house for eleven years; that they would like to push out the back of the house to make the kitchen and dining area larger; that they have six kids and need a larger kitchen and dining area; that they have no neighbors to rear because their backyard meets up to the baseball field.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Durso                                                  Permit#46125

ZBA#17-82

Page 2 of  4

 

Public Comment:

 

Paul Borghese, 95 Lester Drive, Tappan, spoke in support of the application.

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested floor area ratio and rear yard variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant’s property backs up to the baseball fields, and other similar additions have been constructed in the area.

 

 

  1. The requested floor area ratio and rear yard variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The applicant’s property backs up to the baseball fields, and other similar additions have been constructed in the area.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances.

 

 

  1. The requested floor area ratio and rear yard variances, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Durso                                      Permit #46125

ZBA#17-82

Page  3  of  4

 

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested floor area ratio and rear yard variances are APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Durso                                                  Permit#46125

ZBA#17-82

Page  4 of  4

 

 

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested floor area ratio and rear yard  variances  was presented and moved by Ms. Salomon, seconded by Mr. Bosco  and carried as follows: Mr. Bosco, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli and  Mr. Feroldi were absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  October 18, 2017

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-R.A.O.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Related Meetings: Zoning Board October 18, 2017

Upcoming Meetings

May 28, 2025 Project Review Committee

May 28, 2025 Planning Board

June 4, 2025 Zoning Board

June 10, 2025 – Police Commission

June 10, 2025 Historic Board

More Meetings

Follow us!

Follow the Town of Orangetown on Facebook and YouTube. Watch us on Television FIOS Channel 30 and Cablevision Channel 78. Follow the Orangetown Police Department on X (formerly Twitter) for up to date press releases and information.

Contact Us

Orangetown Town Hall
26 Orangeburg Rd,
Orangeburg, NY 10962

845-359-5100

Sign Up!

Sign up for Email updates and alerts from the Town of Orangetown 

Copyright © 2025 Town of Orangetown | WebMuni Framework