Town of Orangetown

Official Town of Orangetown Municipal Website

  • Departments
    • Assessor
    • Building, Zoning, Planning, Administration and Enforcement
      • Architecture & Community Appearance Board of Review
      • Historical Areas Board of Review (HABR)
      • Planning Board
      • Zoning Board of Appeals
    • Environmental Management and Engineering
    • Finance
    • Fire Prevention Bureau
    • Highway Department
    • Information Technology
    • Justice Court
    • Personnel Department
    • Parks and Recreation Department
      • Blue Hill Golf Course
      • Broadacres Golf Course
    • Orangetown Historical Museum & Archives
    • Orangetown Police Department
    • Collector of Taxes
    • Supervisor’s Office
    • Town Attorney
    • Town Clerk
  • Community
    • Arts, Music and Theaters
    • Camp Shanks Museum
    • Colleges and Universities
    • Community Organizations
    • Elected Officials
    • Emergency Services
    • Farmer’s Market
    • Local Support Organizations
    • Food Pantries
    • Orangetown at a Glance
      • Historic Sites
      • Hotels and Lodging
      • Parks and Open Spaces
    • Orangetown Fire Departments
    • Orangetown Historical Museum and Archives
    • Public Libraries
    • Public Schools
    • Utilities
    • Regional Links
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Walkway of Heroes
    • Sports
    • Senior Citizen Information
  • Boards/Committees
    • Boards
      • Town Board
      • Architecture & Community Appearance Board of Review
      • Historical Areas Board of Review (HABR)
      • Planning Board
      • Zoning Board of Appeals
      • Orangetown Housing Authority Board
      • Board of Assessment Review
      • Board of Ethics
      • Sanitation Commission
    • Committees
      • Blue Hill Golf Committee
      • Bureau of Fire Prevention Committee
      • Community Development Block (CDBG) Committee
      • Industrial Use Committee
      • Office of Emergency Management Committee
      • Orangetown Air Quality Review Committee
      • Orangetown Comprehensive Plan Committee
      • Orangetown Environmental Committee
      • Orangetown Parks Development Advisory Committee
      • Project Review Committee
      • Police Reform Committee
      • TV Advisory Committee
      • Shade Tree Commission
      • Volunteer Health Advisory Committee
      • Senior Citizen Advisory Committee
      • Youth Recreation Assessment Advisory Committee
      • Substance Abuse Committee
      • Traffic Advisory Board
  • Agenda/Minutes
    • Town Board
    • Calendar
    • Planning Board
    • Zoning Board of Appeals
    • Architecture & Community Appearance Board
    • Police Reform Committee
    • Historic Areas Board
    • Comprehensive Plan Committee
  • How Do I?
    • View or Pay Property/School Taxes Online
    • Report a Pothole
    • Pay a Ticket
    • Renew My Highway Drop Off Center Permit
    • Order a Municipal Search for a 1 or 2 Family Dwelling Only
    • Request a Streetlight Repair?
    • File an Odor Complaint
    • Report a Potential Code Violation
    • Submit a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) Request
    • Get a Building Permit
    • Sign up for the Do Not Knock Registry
    • Garbage and Recycling Pickup
    • Dispose of Expired and Unused Medications
    • Find Information Regarding Job Openings in the Town of Orangetown
    • Request a New Streetlight?
  • Newsletter Signup

Zoning Board January 16, 2019

Related Meetings: January 16, 2019 Zoning Board

Zoning-Board-Minutes-January-16-2019.pdf

MINUTES

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

JANUARY 16,  2019

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:

DAN SULLIVAN

THOMAS QUINN

JOAN SALOMON

PATRICIA CASTELLI,

LEONARD FEROLDI, ALTERNATE

 

ABSENT:                              MICHAEL BOSCO

 

 

 

ALSO PRESENT:                  Ann Marie Ambrose,              Official Stenographer

Deborah Arbolino,                  Administrative Aide

Denise Sullivan,                      Deputy Town Attorney

 

This meeting was called to order at 7: 00 P.M. by Mr. Sullivan,  Chairman.

Hearings on this meeting’s agenda, which are made a part of this meeting, were held as noted below:

 

PUBLISHED ITEMS

 

APPLICANTS                                   DECISIONS

 

CONTINUED ITEM:

 

DIONNES’S WAY                            POSPONED                                       ZBA#19-01

12-16 North Main Street

Pearl River, New York

68.16 / 6 / 67; PAC zone

 

NEW ITEMS:

 

TUCCI                                                 FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD,                                     ZBA#19-05

132 East Central Avenue                     TOTAL SIDE YARD VARIANCES

Pearl River, NY                                   FOR BUILDING;

68.20/ 2 / 7; CS zone                           SIDE YARD &REAR YARD FOR ACCESSORY

STRUCTURE ACKNOWLEDGED

 

 

FITZPATRICK                                  FRONT YARD FENCE                                ZBA#19-06

203 Summit Avenue                           HEIGHT VARIANCE APPROVED

Tappan, New York

77.06 / 1 / 58; R-15 zone

 

 

PELLEGRINO                                   FLOOR AREA RATIO AND          ZBA#19-07

82 Hamilton Avenue                           ACCESSORY STRUCTURE

Tappan, New York                             DISTANCE FROM PRIMARY

74.17 / 2 / 22; R-15 zone                     STRUCTURE VARIANCE (§ 5.153)

APPROVED

 

 

Page 2

 

 

BRACKEN                                        FRONT YARD VARIANCE                                    ZBA#19-08

31 Tweed Boulevard                          AND SECTION 5.153 VARIANCE

Upper Grandview, New York                        APPROVED

71.09 / 1 / 43; R-22 zone

 

 

OTHER BUSINESS:

In response to requests from the Orangetown  Planning Board, the Zoning Board of Appeals: RESOLVED, to approve the action of the Acting Chairperson executing on behalf of the Board  its consent to the Planning Board acting  as Lead Agency  for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) coordinated environmental review of  actions pursuant to SEQRA Regulations § 617.6 (b)(3) the following application: Madira Framing Corporation: Adjustment to Conservation Easement line Plan- Rochris Subdivision Plan,  226 South Greenbush Road, Orangeburg, NY,  70.19 / 1 / 26; in the R-15 zoning district; Schneider Minor Subdivision Plan, 40 Van Wardt Place , Tappan, NY, 77.15 / 1 / 72; R-15; Fairfield Inn at Orangeburg Commons Site Plan, 5 Greenbush Road, Orangeburg, NY, 74.15 / 1 / 21& 22; LI/ Route 303 Overlay Zone Districts;  and FURTHER RESOLVED, to request to be notified by the Planning Board of SEQRA proceedings, hearings, and determinations  with respect to these matters.

 

 

THE DECISIONS RELATED TO THE ABOVE HEARINGS are inserted herein and made part of these minutes.

 

The verbatim minutes, as recorded by the Board’s official stenographer for the above hearings, are not transcribed.

 

There being no further business to come before the Board, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15  P.M.

 

Dated: January 16, 2019

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

By____________________________

 

Deborah Arbolino, Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

APPLICANT

TOWN ATTORNEY

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS

BUILDING INSPECTOR (Individual Decisions)

Rockland County Planning

 

DECISION

 

  FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD AND TOTAL SIDE YARD VARIANCES APPROVED

LOCATION OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SIDE & REAR YARD ACKNOWLEDGED

To: James Tucci                                                                                  ZBA #19-05

50 Mary Crest Road                                                                    Date: January 16, 2019

West Nyack, New York 10994                                                   Permit #47974

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA# 19-05: Application of Tucci Venture’s LLC for variances from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, CS District, Group FF, Section 3.12, Column 8 ( Front Yard: 0’ or 45’ required, 30.2’ proposed), 9 (Side Yard: 0’ or 12’ required, 5.1’ proposed) and 10 (Total Side Yard: 0’ or 25’ required, 14.2’ proposed) for an addition to an existing building. The property is located at 132 East Central Avenue, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.20, Block 2, Lot 7; in the CS zoning district.

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

James and Eileen Tucci appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Copy of the survey dated September 28,2018 signed and sealed by Robert E. Sorace, L.S..
  2. Architectural Elevations dated May 29, 2018 by Harry J. Goldstein, Architect, not signed or sealed.
  3. A letter dated December 6, 2018 from the Rockland County Highway Department signed by Dyan Rajashingham, Engineer II.
  4. A letter dated December 31, 2018 from the Rockland County Health Department signed by Elizabeth Mello, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer.
  5. A letter dated January 10, 2019 from the Rockland County Sewer District #1 signed by Joseph La Fiandra, Engineer II.
  6. A letter dated January 15, 2019 from the Rockland County Department of Planning signed by Douglas J. Schuetz, Acting Commissioner of Planning.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Denise Sullivan, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows:  Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

 

Tucci

ZBA#19-05                                         Permit #47974

Page 2 of 4

 

James Tucci testified that they have owned the building for 16 years; that he has conducted business there during that time; that they would like to renovate and improve the building aesthetically to blend with the surrounding buildings better; that the porch that exists has concrete pillars and is in need of repair; that they plan to remove it and replace it with a wood front porch that will match the surrounding houses; that they are proposing a low profile ramp and to remove the screened in addition at the rear and make it the same level as the house as an additional room and they will address all of the comments from the Rockland County Highway Department.

 

Eileen Tucci testified that stated that the ramp will add a positive effect for the business; that she is a social worker and specializes in grief and bereavement; that she has been operating her business out of the building for the last four years; that her husbands’ sign has been removed; that they have a tenant upstairs; that the existing building does not conform to the code; and that proposed changes will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood.

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested front yard, side yard and total side yard variances for the house will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The improvements to the building will enhance the neighborhood and the requested variances are minimal since the existing structure is already non-conforming. The Board acknowledged the existing 2.2’ side yard and 1.9’ rear yard for the existing accessory structure garage on the lot.

 

 

  1. The requested front yard, side yard and total side yard variances for the house will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The improvements to the building will enhance the neighborhood and the requested variances are minimal since the existing structure is already non-conforming. The Board acknowledged the existing 2.2’ side yard and 1.9’ rear yard for the existing accessory structure garage on the lot.

 

Tucci

ZBA#19-05                             Permit#47974

Page 3 of 4

 

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances.

 

  1. The requested front yard, side yard and total side yard variances for the house, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community. The improvements to the building will enhance the neighborhood and the requested variances are minimal since the existing structure is already non-conforming. The Board acknowledged the existing 2.2’ side yard and 1.9’ rear yard for the existing accessory structure garage on the lot.

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested front yard, side yard and total side yard variances for the house; (and the Board acknowledged the exiting  2.2’ side yard and 1.9’ rear yard for the existing accessory structure garage) are APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building  department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole Tucci

ZBA#19-05                                         Permit #47974

Page 4 of 4

 

judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested front yard, side yard and total side yard variances for the house; (and the Board acknowledged the 2.2’ side yard and 1.9’ rear yard for the existing accessory structure garage on the lot) are APPROVED; was presented and moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Ms. Castelli, and carried as follows:  Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  January 16, 2019

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-M.M.

 

 

DECISION

 

    FRONT YARD FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPROVED

 

To: Erika Fitzpatrick                                                              ZBA #19-06

203 Summit Avenue                                                         Date: January 16, 2019

Tappan, New York 10983                                               Permit #48407

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA# 19-06: Application of  Erika Fitzpatrick  for a variance from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-15 District, Group M, Section 5.226 (Front Yard Fence Height: 4 ½’ permitted, 6’ proposed) for a six-foot fence at an existing single-family residence. The property is located at 203 Summit Avenue, Tappan, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 77.06, Block 1, Lot 58; in the R-15 zoning district.

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

Erika Fitzpatrick appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Copy of the survey with the fence location drawn on it.
  2. A letter of support from an abutting property owner.

 

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Denise Sullivan, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows:  Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

Erika Fitzpatrick testified that she would like to install a six-foot fence on her property because she lives on a corner lot and has a two and four year old and new baby on the way; that her two year old is really fast and she is afraid to use the yard without a fence; that her two year old daughter would probably climb a four foot fence and she would like the privacy of a six-foot fence.

 

 

Public Comment:

Joe Sinanaj, 123 Lester Road, testified that he lives across the street from the Fitzpatrick’s’ that the property needs a fence;  that he has lived in his house for twenty five years and raised five kids there without one but now that they have a dog they have a fence.

 

Fitzpatrick

ZBA#19-06                                         Permit #48407

Page 2 of 4

 

 

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

 

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested front yard fence height variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The property has two front yards and the proposed fence is going to be set back from the street ten feet.

 

 

  1. The requested front yard fence height variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The property has two front yards and the proposed fence is going to be set back from the street ten feet.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining a variance.

 

  1. The requested front yard fence height variance, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community. The property has two front yards and the proposed fence is going to be set back from the street ten feet.

 

 

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fitzpatrick

ZBA#19-06                             Permit#48407

Page 3 of 4

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested front yard fence height (6.0’) variance is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

Fitzpatrick

ZBA#19-06                                         Permit #48407

Page 4 of 4

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested front yard fence height (6.0’) variance is APPROVED; was presented and moved by Mr. Quinn, seconded by Ms. Salomon  and carried as follows: Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  January 16, 2019

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-D.M.

 

 

DECISION

 

   FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE AND § 5.153 (ACCESSORY BUILDING DISTANCE TO PRIMARY STRUCTURE VARIANCE) APPROVED

 

To: Michael Pellegrino                                                                        ZBA #19-07

82 Hamilton Avenue                                                                    Date: January 16, 2019

Tappan, New York 10983                                                           Permit #48330

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA# 19-07: Application of  Michael Pellegrino for a variance from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-15, District, Section 3.12, Group M, Column 4 (Floor Area Ratio: .20 permitted, .23 proposed) and from § 5.153( accessory structure distance to primary building: 15’ required, 9.1’ existing)  for a shed at an existing single family residence. The property is located at 82 Hamilton Avenue, Tappan, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 74.17, Block 2, Lot 22; in the R-15 zoning district.

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

Michael and Mary Pellegrino appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Survey dated October 19, 2018 signed and sealed by Anthony Celentano, PLS.
  2. Three pages of shed plans by Dream Spaces dated 10/13/2018.

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Denise Sullivan, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows:  Mr. Bosco, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye.

 

Michael Pellegrino testified that they would like to keep the existing shed and they need a variance for floor area ratio because of the size of the shed; that the shed is 10’ x 12’.

 

 

Ms. Salomon stated that the shed needs a variance for its location because it is less than 15’ from the primary structure.

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment

 

 

 

 

 

Pellegrino

ZBA#19-07                                         Permit #48330

Page 2 of 4

 

 

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

 

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

 

  1. The requested floor area ratio (0.20 permitted, and 0.23 proposed) variance and § 5.153(accessory structure distance to primary building: 15’ required, 9.1’ existing) for a shed will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties.

 

 

  1. The requested floor area ratio (0.20 permitted, and 0.23 proposed)  variance and 5.153(accessory structure distance to primary building: 15’ required, 9.1’ existing) for a shed will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining a variance.

 

  1. The requested floor area ratio (0.20 permitted, and 0.23 proposed) variance and § 5.153(accessory structure distance to primary building: 15’ required, 9.1’ existing) for a shed although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community.

 

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

 

Pellegrino

ZBA#19-07                             Permit#48330

Page 3 of 4

 

 

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested floor area ratio (0.23)  variance and §5.153 (accessory structure distance to primary building: 15’ required, 9.1’ existing) variance  for a shed is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

 

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

 

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

Pellegrino

ZBA#19-07                                         Permit #48330

Page 4 of 4

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested floor area ratio (0.20 permitted and 0.23 proposed) variance and §5.153 (accessory structure distance to primary building: 15’ required, 9.1’ existing) for a shed is APPROVED; was presented and moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Quinn and carried as follows: Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  January 16, 2019

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-D.M.

 

 

DECISION

 

   FRONT YARD VARIANCE AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN A FRONT YARD VARIANCE APPROVED

 

To: Steven Silverberg (Bracken)                                                        ZBA #19-08

120 White Plains Road Suite 305                                    Date: January 16, 2019

Tarrytown, New York 10591                                          Permit #44472

 

 

FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown

 

ZBA# 19-08: Application of  Bracken Site Plan  for variances from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-22, District, Section 3.12, Group I, Columns 8 (Front Yard: 40’ required,, 2.5’ existing to existing ground level deck: 15.7’ existing to corner of house, 14.7’ proposed for deck stairs and 27’ proposed to hot tub) and from Section 5.153 ( No accessory structure is permitted in the front yard) for the installation of an outdoor hot tub and circular staircase at an existing residence. The property is located at 31 Tweed Boulevard, Upper Grandview, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 71.09, Block 1, Lot 43; in the R-22 zoning district.

 

 

Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on  Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.

 

Chuck Bracken and Steve Silverberg, Attorney, appeared and testified.

 

The following documents were presented:

 

  1. Site plan for Bracken dated 06/22/2018 with the latest revision date of 10/15/2018 signed and sealed by John J. Bezuyen, P.L.S..
  2. A memorandum dated November 7, 2017 from Jane Slavin, RA., Director, O.B.Z.P.A.E..
  3. A five page letter from Steven Silverberg, Attorney for the applicant dated November 19, 2018.
  4. Planning board Decision #15-35 dated November 8, 2017.
  5. ZBA Decision #18-26 dated May 2, 2018 for a pool in the front yard and ZBA#17-61 dated September 6, 2017 for a garage in a front yard.
  6. Sundance “Spas 980 Kingston Specifications (6 pages).
  7. Spiral staircase details (2 pages).

 

 

Mr. Sullivan, Chairman, made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

On advice of Denise Sullivan, Deputy Town Attorney,  counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows:  Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

Bracken

ZBA#19-08                                         Permit #44472

Page 2 of 4

 

Steven Silverberg, Attorney testified that the property is located in an R-22 zone; that the Planning board granted a preliminary approval and a neg dec on November 8, 2017; the proposed location of the hot tub is situated 27 feet from the front yard and the proposed location of the circular staircase  is 38 feet from the front yard which does not meet the minimum requirement; that there is a strong basis for granting the variance, the property is located on a County road and between the house and road are trees and three rock structures, making improvements virtually unnoticeable from the surrounding area; that these improvements will be hidden from the road by the natural tree line and rock structures and by the topography of the lot; the existing patio that will hold the hot tub is set low on the property and the hot tub is only34” high; that the staircase is necessary  to access the patio from the exiting upper deck; that this Board granted a variance for a pool in the front yard at 20 Arlene Court in Pearl River and for a garage in the front yard at 26 Shadyside; that there will not be an undesirable change to the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties; that the benefit sought cannot be achieved any other way because of the slope and configuration of the property; that the request may be looked at as substantial but it does allow the applicant to improve the use and enjoyment of his property and it will not have any adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood and whether it is self-created should be considered but a reason to preclude the granting of the requested variances.

 

Chuck Bracken testified that the house was built in 1982 and that the patio area will be maintained as it is will the hot tub on it.

 

Public Comment:

 

No public comment

 

 

The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application.

 

 

A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received.

 

Mr. Sullivan made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS:

After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons:

 

  1. The requested front yard variances (40’ required, 2.5’ existing to existing ground level deck: 15.7’ existing to corner of house, 14.7’ proposed for deck stairs and 27’ proposed to hot tub) and Section 5.153 (accessory structure in front yard) variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The property is in a critical environmental area and placing the hot tub on an existing patio (which on the side of the house) will not have a negative effect on the environment or the steep slope.

Bracken

ZBA#19-08                             Permit#44472

Page 3 of 4

 

  1. The requested front yard variance (40’ required, 2.5’ existing to existing ground level deck: 15.7’ existing to corner of house, 14.7’ proposed for deck stairs and 27’ proposed to hot tub)  and Section 5.153 (accessory structure in front yard) variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The property is in a critical environmental area and placing the hot tub on an existing patio (which on the side of the house)  will not have a negative effect on the environment or the steep slope.

 

  1. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining a variance.

 

  1. The requested front yard variance (40’ required, 2.5’ existing to existing ground level deck: 15.7’ existing to corner of house, 14.7’ proposed for deck stairs and 27’ proposed to hot tub) and Section 5.153 (accessory structure in front yard) variance, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community. The property is in a critical environmental area and placing the hot tub on an existing patio (which on the side of the house) will not have a negative effect on the environment or the steep slope.

 

  1. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown’s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

 

DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board RESOLVED that the application for the requested front yard variance (40’ required, 2.5’ existing to existing ground level deck: 15.7’ existing to corner of house, 14.7’ proposed for deck stairs and 27’ proposed to hot tub) and Section 5.153 (accessory structure in front yard) variance is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.

 

General Conditions:

 

(i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth.

 

(ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth.

 

 

(iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation,

the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any

variances being requested.

Bracken

ZBA#19-08                                         Permit #44472

Page 4 of 4

 

(iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy.

 

 

(v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision.  Merely obtaining a Building Permit  with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute “substantial implementation” for the purposes hereof.

 

 

 

 

The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested front yard variance (40’ required, 2.5’ existing to existing ground level deck: 15.7’ existing to corner of house, 14.7’ proposed for deck stairs and 27’ proposed to hot tub) and Section 5.153 (accessory structure in front yard) variance is APPROVED; was presented and moved by Ms. Salomon, seconded by Ms. Castelli  and carried as follows: Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; and Ms. Castelli, aye. Mr. Bosco was absent.

 

The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

DATED:  January 16, 2019

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN

 

 

 

By__________________

Deborah Arbolino

Administrative Aide

DISTRIBUTION:

 

APPLICANT                                                             TOWN  CLERK

ZBA  MEMBERS                                                      HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR                                                                          ASSESSOR

TOWN BOARD MEMBERS                                    DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL

TOWN ATTORNEY                                                                MGMT. and ENGINEERING

DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY                                                FILE,ZBA, PB

OBZPAE                                                                  CHAIRMAN,  ZBA, PB, ACABOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR-G.M.

 

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Related Meetings: January 16, 2019 Zoning Board

Upcoming Meetings

May 21, 2025 Zoning Board

May 28, 2025 Project Review Committee

May 28, 2025 Planning Board

June 10, 2025 – Police Commission

June 10, 2025 Historic Board

More Meetings

Follow us!

Follow the Town of Orangetown on Facebook and YouTube. Watch us on Television FIOS Channel 30 and Cablevision Channel 78. Follow the Orangetown Police Department on X (formerly Twitter) for up to date press releases and information.

Contact Us

Orangetown Town Hall
26 Orangeburg Rd,
Orangeburg, NY 10962

845-359-5100

Sign Up!

Sign up for Email updates and alerts from the Town of Orangetown 

Copyright © 2025 Town of Orangetown | WebMuni Framework